Fearless Fox

The World of the Valiant Vulpine

Domain Change
[info]eureka2814

For anyone who still follows this blog, I'm letting you know that I am about to bid a tearful farewell to Livejournal and move The Fearless Fox to Wordpress.

The blog is now at http://thefearlessfox.wordpress.com/ .

Stay awesome, foxers.


Backyard Camping, Forever.
[info]eureka2814

College is, at this point, considered the next logical step in a person's education. If you don't go to college, then everyone tells you you can't get a job, which means you can't pay for a house, which means you have nowhere to live, which means you end up sleeping in a box in an alleyway until you die tragically of pneumonia or get eaten by rabid dogs, just because you were too cheap and/or untalented to attend a university.

What they don't tell you is that this guy is a rocket surgeon.
There's not much of a demand for trauma surgery on munitions.


In case you haven't figured it out by now, throughout high school I used this blog exclusively to avoid homework. Then, I acquired something of a social life, and I discovered more interesting ways to avoid being productive, such as:

1) Singing drunkenly in public without ever actually being drunk,
2) Playing silent football, which is neither silent nor football. It is also scientifically proven to be the best game ever (people in India think it's cricket. They're wrong).
3) Going on walks around campus at midnight in twenty degree weather, then waking up my roommate when I get back at three in the morning. (She thinks I go partying. Actually we walk around and talk about comic books and Call of C'thulhu. Same difference.)
4) Creating ever-more elaborate plots to facilitate the acquisition of copious amounts of caffeine.(By the way, I just discovered that Red Bull "temporarily raised the cardiovascular risk in [drinkers] to a level comparable to that of an individual with established coronary artery disease" (Wikipedia). It also tastes faintly like cigarette ashes and sugar.)
5) HOLY CRAP IS THAT SLENDER MAN?!



As finals week approaches, however, I realize once more that all my friends are Honors Students, and we all actually need to study.
That includes me, by the way, but I have no particular urge to acknowledge that right now.

College, by the way, is the time in which you're supposed to figure out who you are and what you want to do with this big gigantic thing called "your life". I'm not sure what this "life" thing is all about, but since college soul-searching seems to be the chic thing to do, I sat down the other day and tried to figure out what I was going to do with my "life" (which I believe to be entirely fictional).

I've always been something of a writer, but I resisted this fact with all my being. In fact, I have this really annoying inner-writer type chick, who never shuts up.

At some point in my eleventh grade year, I ambushed her with a bludgeon and dragged her out into the woods somewhere, hoping that she'd get lost so that I could actually establish some semblance of a productive  livelihood. She escaped, and we repeated the process for something on two years until I eventually decided that the only way I was going to get a respectable job was to drug her and put her in the Land of the Lost, along with all the dinosaurs, dragons, and werewolves from my childhood.

This worked for longer than usual, about four months, and then she showed up again, spitting mad about being stranded with alongside Jerry the Stegosaurus Werewolf (my imaginary friend from when I was six). She looked suspiciously badasser than I remembered.

Fuuuuuuuu-

"Oh, hey," I said, with a nervous laugh, feeling around behind me for my nightstick without breaking eye contact. "Long time no see."

The worst part about all this is that the last time I saw this chick, she was this bouncy, nonchalant kind of person who would occasionally pop into my head and cheerily suggest something. Maybe she'd strong-arm me sometimes with her annoying insistence, but she was otherwise pretty agreeable.

But now I had the nagging question - where the hell did she get the sword?! And how was she planning on using it?

"I LEARNED TO FIGHT VELOCIRAPTORS," she shouted at me, in a voice that said I am undoubtedly a complete badass now.

"That's nice," I replied, "But I'm a biology person now... so go away."

"VELOCIRAPTORS," she repeated. I was beginning to sense some resentment. "AND TYRANNOSAURS."

"Oh yeah, I've got a lot of those. Inner Tyrannosaurs. Sorry about that," I said, "But for reals. You have to go back."

You can imagine how well this worked out.


Too close. Too close.

To make a long story short, I have since resigned myself to the fact that I am, in fact, a writer, in spite of the knowledge that it would be so much cooler to solve murders or botch genetic experiments (resulting in a Jurassic Park-like scenario, in which I could actually fight velociraptors).

I ask myself sometimes, "Damn, what am I going to do with my life?"

"You're going to starve," I always reply, pointedly.

Really, I had no idea. Thank you, me.

You're welcome, me.


Writing is one of those things you only do for a living when you can't live with not doing it. It's not like there's a huge market for it. Ninety per-cent of writers are profoundly irritating, egotistical people.

Not me, of course. I'm too awesome to be egotistical. I mean, come on.

It's all right, though. I've got a friend of mine who's a writer, but also has the foresight to get a degree in geophysics; she's invited me to live in her totally lavish and awesome backyard after we graduate, along with the rest of our destined-to-starve friends (a psychology major, a film major, a fine arts major, and a classics/linguistics/philosophy major).

This will likely result in a miniature, slum-like tent city.


This, you see, is the ideal.

Homelessness! It's like the ultimate survival camping trip, but with dumpster diving and sleeping on newspapers. Homeless people are secret badasses.

I am a secret badass... I am a secret badass...

Blimey, who am I kidding? I'm a starving writer destined to live in a box.


.


Critical Mission Failure.
[info]eureka2814

I'm not even going to bother apologizing. Instead, I will throw myself at your feet, and beg for mercy.
Pleaseohpleaseohpleaseforgivemeeeee.
...now that that's out of the way, I'm going to launch into this like I never vanished off the face of the planet.

Video games!
They say to write what you know. And since I'm out of school and have done nothing productive for the last several months, what I know right now is games. And sleeping. But I'm saving my post about sleeping, for when the world ends and everyone suddenly starts caring.

It's no small secret that I'm an avid gamer. Unfortunately, it is also common knowledge that I suck at video games, which would make you think that I'd find a different hobby.

I haven't.

Most of my time playing video games is spent staring at screens like this:


Subtext: You suck.

And this:


And this.

At least they're straightforward.


As such, I tend to stick to single-player games - that is, games in which nobody is affected by my imminent failure but me. That way, when I fall and die in a pit of acid forty times in a row, at least I'm the only one who knows about it. Online games , on the other hand, have this tendency to make all of your shortcomings blindingly obvious - somehow, because I can't hit a target four times my size, I am a failure as a gamer (I like to think of myself as "alternatively gifted"). When I do play online games, my favourite role is "the person that gets everyone killed." Others like playing healers; I like playing the idiot. This can get tiring, however, so the only online game I really play is Left 4 Dead, and only with people I know personally.

Still, our sessions end up looking like this:

Friend 1: "Boomer!"

Me: "There's no Boomer here, you... HOLY CRAP I CAN'T SEE."

Friend 2: "OH MY GOD! HUNTER! GET IT OFF GET IT OFF SHOOT THIS THING!"

Me: "...Am I still being attacked by zombies? I can't see."


I'm not sure what I'm looking at because my eyes are covered in puke, apparently.

Friend 1: "Eureka, get 2! I'm cornered!"

Me: "...is my character still holding a gun? I don't hear gunshots. Where are the zombies? I can't see. "

Friend 2: "Oh my god! Oh my god! It's ripping my intestines out! Get it off! Get it off!"

Friend 1: "SMOKER SMOKER SMOKER OH MY GOD I'M CHOKING TO DEATH"

Friend 4: "...I just got charged off a skyscraper."

Me: "Guys, I can see agai... oh, I died."


In case you've never played Left 4 Dead, it's a game about zombies. Some of these zombies have superpowers, which include: leaping the length of a football field to rip your intestines out, throwing up on you and making you a blind zombie-magnet, running at you really fast and crushing your rib cage, licking you to death, laughing maniacally, dribbling stomach acid on your face, and being really big.
Also crying
.


In light of this, I basically avoid online multiplayer for many of the same reasons I avoid competitive sports (although, comparatively, athletes are slightly less likely to call you a "n00b fag! lulz" ). That's something sports and games have in common: I am terrible at both of them. They are both competitive, frustrating, and psychologically damaging, and both have a sector of of super-elite players that reside pompously at the top and occasionally spit on our lowly n00b heads.

This has not deterred me from either.

Unfortunately, gaming is an exceptionally expensive hobby. Your typical game will run 20 bucks a pop, and as an unemployed college freshman with absolutely no disposable income, it looks like I'll have to come up with a plan B.



I'll start selling my organs. That should do it.


But Eureka, you're saying. What happens when you run out of organs? 

I clone them, of course! It's an excuse to develop cheap, efficient cloning technology. See? There are benefits to this. Eureka gets money to keep gaming, and the world gets extra organs AND good cloning technology.

Eureka, you're probably thinking, somewhat disgustedly. Why not just find a different hobby?

And to you I say: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. No.






Not-So-Secret Mission
[info]eureka2814
This is why I haven't posted in four weeks. Black Market knows I'm after them, of course, but I'm far too sneaky for them to catch.
Wish me luck, Foxers.


                              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBoUOIHveMIIncognito.

Stand-Up Comedy: Vlog
[info]eureka2814

Haven't posted in a while. You know the apology drill. Here's the vlog:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYWQTKy_NpY

The Hokey-Pokey Tyrannosaur
[info]eureka2814

Now do the hokey-pokey, and turn yourself around. . .

I stumbled upon this image while surfing Wikipedia for possible topics. Before you start giving me that look, allow me to explain.

 I thought I would keep going with my mythological creature kick, and decided to plug "dragon" into Wikipedia. I quickly became distracted and clicked on "dinosaur", which was followed by two hours of fascinated clicking that eventually led me to "deciduous teeth"(which are a feature that most mammals and some of their immediate ancestors share).
 
Anyway, in case you didn't know, there's this ongoing debate in paleontology about whether Tyrannosaurus rex was a scavenger or an apex predator. In fact, it's quite the heated argument, especially considering that most involved in it are those who have chosen to sift around in the dirt for a living. In any case, the "Chicken-and-Theropod" picture is somehow supposed to illustrate how T. rex could not possibly have hunted for sustenance -something about how "a 6-tonne chicken would have needed leg muscles making up almost 100% of its body mass for running.", and how good ol' Rex couldn't have ever run fast enough to catch much of anything, except perhaps small children and old ladies with walkers. The argument was that T. rex  could only have run approximately 11 mph - to put this in perspective, average running speed for an adult human is between six and eleven mph. If you're a slow runner, you're screwed, but I'm willing to bet that most people would be capable of a lot faster speeds if they had a six-ton theropod on their tail.

Or a six-ton chicken, for that matter, which brings me back to our picture.

I truly and honestly do not understand how this image illustrates the paleontologists' point. It's like, hey, let's superimpose a T. rex with a gigantic freaking chicken, and then maybe people will understand that in order for that chicken to run fast enough to hunt, it would have to have some mammoth drumsticks.

I don't know about you, but I definitely would have gotten the point if they'd just said, "The T. rex couldn't have had enough muscle mass to run quickly." They didn't have to bring poultry into it at all. But no. For some reason, they felt the irresistable urge to make this about chickens.

I actually think, upon looking at that picture, that I'm more afraid of the chicken than I am of the dinosaur. The dinosaur looks relatively harmless, if pointy-toothed. The rooster, however, looks...
Insane.
It's a showdown and the dinosaur's going to lose. Maybe the paleontologists are dropping hints; maybe they've discovered that the dinosaurs weren't wiped out by a meteor after all, but rather were pecked to extinction by gigantic chickens.

I eat Triceratops for breakfast.


The chicken's like, "Hey, I weigh five tons now, fear me. I'ma peck your head off. Cock-a-doodle-doo, bitches."

He's like some bizarre action hero. It's Chickenzilla, and the T. rex is his sidekick. Hen-man and Rex. The way cartoons are going these days, sorry to say, I'm actually looking foward to The Adventures of Hen-Man, starring Adam West. 
 
 
Quick! It's the Fowl Signal, Hen-man!






I mean, really. What in the entire Neogene period is this supposed to be depicting? I'm at a loss for a definite interpretation. Are they superheroes? Are they dancing? Are they comparing leg size? Are they having a leisurely walk across Laurasia? Are they having a showdown? Are they scavenging for worms in the dirt? Are they having some sort of insane, cross-country street race? Are they preparing for a gentlemanly bout of fisticuffs? Are they collaborating to hunt old ladies, even though neither of them have the drumsticks for that anyway? Are they fleeing from a small child in a gas mask? Are they playing tag, or perhaps running dramatically towards the camera? And why are they the same size?

It almost makes me want to go into paleontology, just so I can ask my professor what the hell is with this picture. Say, Professor, there haven't been any sixty-foot chicken fossils discovered recently, have there? Well, no, why do you ask, you strange human being?
This will be in a museum one day.

In any case, I'm still totally baffled. If you think of anything else these two might be doing, feel free to say so, because I haven't the faintest.

I'm not sure I'll ever be able to eat chicken again. What if they're related to Hen-man? What'll I do when a six-ton rooster and his Cretaceous sidekick smash through my roof to wreak their eternal revenge?

All I can advise, dearest readers, is extreme caution concerning poultry and eggs.


Les Loups-Garous
[info]eureka2814


Well, now that I've got your attention, it's time to get on to today's topic: werewolves. The loups-garous, the hombres lobos, the lobizones. Not the hunky Twilight variety that I so want to strangle -- legitimate werewolves. Giant hairy wolfmen with gigantor unibrows and freakish claws that eat my sheep (oh noes) and devour housecats (good riddance). 

From the time I was six until I was thirteen or so, I was dead sure that I was a werewolf. Most eight-year-olds want to be vets or firemen. I wanted to be a lycanthropic dragon-rider. The thing about this aspiration is that when you're seven years old, adults can blame the overactive imagination, but when you're thirteen, you just end up looking... well, really strange.
A dream come true!

I digress.

Anyway, I was perusing through the Wikipedia entry on Werewolves, when I stumbled across this medieval superstition:

"Werewolves were said in European folklore to bear tell-tale physical traits even in their human form. These included the meeting of both eyebrows at the bridge of the nose, curved fingernails, low set ears and a swinging stride. One method of identifying a werewolf in its human form was to cut the flesh of the accused, under the pretense that fur would be seen within the wound. A Russian superstition recalls a werewolf can be recognised by bristles under the tongue... After returning to their human forms, werewolves are usually documented as becoming weak, debilitated and undergoing painful nervous depression. Many historical werewolves were written to have suffered severe melancholia and manic depression, being bitterly conscious of their crimes."

Long story short: if you have a unibrow, you are a werewolf. If your ears are low-set, you are a werewolf. If you have long nails, sway when you walk, or have a hairy tongue, you are a werewolf. If you are depressed, and a wimp, you are also most likely a werewolf. If you have all of these traits, we would very much like to handcuff you and burn you at the stake, because we're pretty sure you've been eating our sheep, or at least our housepets.  
 Well, crap.

What this is beginning to sound like is a milennia-long conspiracy against hairy depressed people with low-set ears. I mean, seriously. It makes me wonder who first said, "Hey, you know what? That guy with a unibrow seems suspicious. I know! He transforms into hairy beast and goes after livestock on the full moon! That's the only logical explanation!" Or, worse, "That person seems particularly sad. Let's decapitate him, throw his head in a river, and then burn whatever's left to prevent him from becoming a vampire!"

Frida Kahlo: fits all the criteria.
                                                                                Fearless Fox: loves screwing up your perception of history.



(Kahlo, by the way, was an early-20th-century surrealist who's famous for her self-portraits. She also suffered (briefly or long-term, I'm not certain) from depression. Although I cannot say for certain whether or not she had a hairy tongue or walked with a swinging gait, I really wouldn't put it past that unibrow.
Forget all that Chupacabra rubbish. It's been Frida Kahlo all along. Kahlo and her creepy-ass, spikey-haired zombie monkey. )

Interestingly enough, legends about the loups-garous exist in most European cultures. From Ireland to Slovenia to Argentina and seemingly everywhere in between, there are faoladh and volkodlak and lobizones. They have varúlfur in Iceland, and bleidd-ddyn in Wales.

Superstitious about these critters vary from culture-to-culture. Some cultures endorsed decapitation; others favoured calling the werewolf's name. For example, the ancient Romans would make the lycanthropos exercise until they fell over exhausted, in the hopes that it would somehow cure them of their wolfishness. Some cultures would try to surgically remove the disease ( "I wonder what this is, it must be the source of the lycanthropy, oh wait that was his liver). The Danes believed that scolding a werewolf would cure it (Swiper no swiping!). The Sicilians believed that "striking it on the forehead with a scalpel or knife" would cure the werewolfism (hold on, unibrow man, I only want to hit you with a scalpel), and a certain group of Germans thought that adressing it thrice by its Christian name would turn it right (Irishwristwatch Irishwristwatch Irishwristwatch WHO CAME UP WITH THIS GUY'S NAME).

 Obviously, none of these methods were terribly effective, as the legends have stuck around and nobody seems to agree upon how to get rid of werewolves. I mean, if something worked, there should at least be a general consensus. The one thing that irks me is that nobody called an exterminator before Stephanie Meyer showed up.

I know some people who would love you hit you in the forehead with a scalpel a coupla times.

The widespread tales about werewolves lead me to believe one of two things:

1) All Europeans are absolutely terrified of unibrows.
2) ZOMG WEREWOLVES ARE REAL, YO.



The full moon is next Woden's daeg. So, as a friendly message to my readers, I advise you to keep careful watch for bipolar unibrowlings. In case of emergency, behead them, and then burn them. I'm sure the cops will understand.

 Sexy beast, indeed!

A Lemmingload of Excuses
[info]eureka2814


Before I begin, I would like to say that I have a totally valid excuse for failing to post for nigh on a month.

Actually, I don't. Of course, there were finals, which are terrifically stressful when you're applying to high-end colleges that want midyear reports before they'll even consider you. Then there was a series of days in which I was required to spend time with my extended family due to a once-per-year obligation, and then I left town to go skiing, and then there was New Year's Eve, and then shortly thereafter was New Year's day, and then school started again and I've been doing homework ever since.

 By the way, happy new year, Foxers.

Which, now that I think of it, is what I should currently be doing (homework, I mean), but I'm fairly certain Toni Morrison can wait.

The problem is that I don't particularly have anything to write about. Like, recently, I figured out that the gene for seeing colour is located on the x-chromosome (explaining why males are more prone to colourblindness and why they cannot for the life of them see the difference between scarlet, crimson, and carmine - it's all red, good grief), but after a quick draft I realised that this was something I could only elaborate upon for about a paragraph and a half.
What do you mean, you don't see a boat?

Humans have more than five senses, apparently. Depending on the estimate, according to Wikipedia, we actually have between nine and twenty, but I really only buy into equilibrioception (the ability to sense speed and acceleration, which doesn't technically fall into the "touch" category) proprioception (the ability to know where one's limbs are located without seeing or feeling them ) and chronoception (which is a word I made up meaning having a sense of time). However, I suspect we are not told this in elementary school because 1) it is likely beyond the grasp of a five-year-old and 2) The Twenty-First Sense would be a terrible name for a movie, as would The Nth Sense (because we're not sure how many humans acutally have). Once again, however, I could only continue the terrible M. Night Shyamalan jokes for about a paragraph before they grew stale as stale cookies.
They'll give you gonorrhea.

Also, my analogies are really, really off today.

Lemmings, apparently, "do not engage in mass suicidal dives off cliffs", but "they will, however, occasionally, and unintentionally fall off cliffs when venturing into unknown territory". This is, of course, according to Wikipedia, which also notes that the misconception stems from the Disney film White Wilderness, which shot many of the migration scenes on a snow-covered turntable of some kind. The article also noted that the "photographers later pushed the lemmings off a cliff". (Another Wiki entry notes that the lemmings of White Wilderness were "launched off a cliff using a turntable", which conjures up images so bizarre and hilarious that I can't help wondering who thought this up).
I will take great delight in correcting people's misconceptions about lemmings, and I look foward to telling them that Disney enjoys launching innocent animals from high precipices. (this, by the way, is inexcusable, even if the lemmings are incapable of noticing such precipices for themselves when in new territories)


A member of the species Lemmus lemmus, A.K.A the pseudo-suicidal rodent.
Now that I'm on the topic of lemmings, I can't stop thinking about the word "lemming". It's so funny-sounding. Even their scientific name is goofy. Lemmus lemmus - can't we get any more creative? Maybe Lemmus autodefenstratus, or Lemmus disneydefenestratus, or Lemmus adorableus, or Lemmus precipitatus (according to Wiki, it was once believed that Lemmings fell from the sky). Perhaps even Lemmus lemon, just to confuse people. But Lemmus lemmus? That's about as creative as the scientific name for gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) -  it just seems like the scientsits ran out of ideas.
(Perhaps it's a joke. Say "Lemmus lemmus" five times fast and see how you do.)

All I can find on the word is that it means "small arctic rodent" and is from Norwegian. In fact, the word for lemming is the same in a lot of European languages - Lemming is the word for lemming in Norwegian, Dutch, German, Armenian, English, Irish, Italian, French (and maybe a few others, including - get ready! - ICELANDIC). Even the Russian word for lemming - лемминг - translates into Roman script as "lemming". Many other European languages that lack the word "lemming" use the word "leming" - which is the same, but missing the second m. Lemmings, lemmings, everywhere! (By the way, this is all from Google Translate, so if I have somehow managed to maim your language, please correct me. Unless, of course, your language happens to be Icelandic, in which case I will solemnly apologise and continue to make fun of you.)

So perhaps it's not from Norwegian at all. Like, seriously. How much influence did Norwegian really have on the word for "lemming" in basically every other European language? I've almost come to the conclusion that the word "lemming" has some sort of deeper meaning... that it has penetrated European languages and remained almost unscathed... that the world... nay, the universe... is ruled by lemmings, perhaps created by lemmings, watched by some whiskered, adorable, lemming deity...

But no. The fact that the word is the same in a lot of languages is simply due to a terrible lack of lemmings outside of Norway. The Norwegians arrive, talking about these suicidal snow gerbils, and calling them lemmings. And the rest of the world has no concept of such things. They have not seen lemmings. They  have not touched lemmings. They have not even vaguely thought of lemmings before the Norwegians arrive gushing about them. (hvað á jörðinni er lemming?)

So they don't have a word for lemmings, and rather than calling them "snow rats" (or the Icelandic equivalent thereof, which, by the way, is snjór rottur), they just decide to save themselves a lemmingload of work and just use the Norwegian word. Hence, we have the omnipresent lemming, which is essentially unchanged in a whole slew of European languages.

But where did the Norwegians get it?

The mystery remains! 
 

Oh, and by the way, until I wrote this post, I was convinced that lemmings were a variety of small,  grey, flightless bird. Shows you what I know.

No, really.



 



Vlog: Frogs
[info]eureka2814

We're in vlog form to-day. Enjoy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnNnt_l8Q64

The Bastardized Onion
[info]eureka2814
To-day's  topic:

I have no idea.

Usually I approach these things with a game plan, but I don't really have one right now. I just know I need to post, or it's going to gnaw on my subconscious and give me terrible dreams about my  blog coming to eat me in the dead of night.  So I think I'm just going to begin writing, and hopefully something meaningful will appear.

I learned yesterday that the word "garlic" is from the two Anglo-Saxon words "gar", meaning spear, and "leac" meaning leek. Literally, in Anglo-saxon, "spear-leek", which may or may not explain why they're so delicious in everything (I'm going to go with not).


Now I don't really know where I was going with that. Here's a curiosity, though. The name of garlic in Spanish - ajo - is (get this) Celtic in origin. Not Latin, not Arabic, but Celtic.
(If you're interested: "Su nombre latino ( ajo, alho, ali aglio, alla, allo) proviene del vocablo celta allá que significa fuerte ardiente e incendiario; mientras que su nombre anglosajón “ garlic” tiene origen en la palabra gar  ( atravesar), y leac  ( olla, marmita) lo que probablemente este vinculado a su fuerte olor. " 
I dare you not to plug this into Google translate.)

Now, it's all well and good that  ajo comes from a Celtic word that means (basically) "strong burning", but why Celtic of all things? I have to admit that I'm not very familiar with the linguisitic history of Spanish; I know it has a lot of Arabic influence from the several centuries in which southern Spain was inhabited by Moors. But Celtic? Did the Celts get pissed and invade Spain for no apparent reason? Did the Spanish get pissed and try to invade the British Isles for no apparent reason? (actually, this happened several times, but I'm not sure if that has any bearing here) Did they have a basketball showoff to see who would get to name the spear-leeks? (Yay for Boston. The Spaniards aren't exactly renowned for their balling skillz, are they?)

The Wiki page is no help. It simply suggests that there had to exist a population of Celts in Spain, and they had to exist long enough for word-borrowing to occur, and they had to speak Continental Celtic as opposed to Insular Celtic, and that for some reason or another they're not there any more. Also it makes sure to mention that the evolution of the tongue may well have been an internal process.

 

This is so incredibly vague that you could make a horoscope out of it. What is the problem with these people and not sticking to one story? First it's from Celtic, then it's not, then the Celts had to exist in Spain, but maybe they didn't, or maybe it was the Gauls, (damn those Gauls), oh and by the way Arabic is really important but who cares, perhaps it all just sorta happened and who knows why?

(Random sidenote: I find it amusing that the Wiki page says that the Visigoths inhabited Spain for a century or two, but that their influence was rather limited. After all, the only thing they did was add an entire verb tense. But the Moors, they were really important, they just kinda heaped a bunch of words and sayings onto the language but didn't add any grammar, by the way, so let's focus on them even though all they did was add words, words, words. And funny-sounding words at that. Words like almohada and alfombra and asesino and cifra and alhaja (pronounced al-ha-ha by the way),  meaning pillow,carpet, assassin, cipher, and jewel repectively. These are words that are exceptionally fun to spit angrily - imagine swearing "carpet" at someone and having it sound awful.

P.S. This won't work in Spanish-speaking countries. You'll get committed to an asylum if you're not careful. )

Further research is leading me to believe that it's not actually from Celtic, but nobody is offering any other theories to explain where the heck ajo comes from. Read: NOBODY KNOWS. It's the mystery leek. It's the enigma onion. Not a single person has any clue why spear-leeks are called ajos in Spanish.

Or perhaps it's a conspiracy and they're all trying desperately to confuse me. If this is the case, it's working splendidly.

Thinking that perhaps other languages may be able to clear up the mystery, I discovered that garlic is aglio in Italian, l'ail in French, knoblauch in German, allium in Latin, garlleg in Welsh, garlic in Irish (go figure), hvítlaukur in Icelandic,  ثوم in Arabic, 大蒜 in Chinese, чеснок in Russian, σκόρδο in Greek, ニンニク in Japanese, and שום in Hebrew.

Even after careful consideration, this certainly didn't clear a lot up for me. Aglio  and allium are the only ones that even sound vaguely similar to ajo. The Arabic word is pronounced "thwm", which isn't even close (no vowels, no vowels, I think I'll go cry in a corner).


Moral of the story: garlic's name is one of fuzzy origins at best. Ajo is apparently a complete bastard word. Icelandic puts v's after h's, which is, well, Icelandic. Even the English/Irish word is bizarre. I mean, come on. "Spear leeks"?
 
What the heck was wrong with the Angles?


Anyway. I set out to write this with no idea what I was going to talk about, decided to educate you about garlic and the Spanish language, and now I am leaving with absolutely nothing accomplished.

C'est la vie, je suppose que. At least I can say "garlic" in Icelandic now.

(My full Icelandic arsenal: "Ég get ekki talað íslensku .Hvar er salernið? Ég er að deyja úr hræðilegt sár stunga. Hvítlauk." or, "I don't speak Icelandic. Where's the bathroom? Ah, I'm dying of horrible stab wounds. Garlic.")




...Although quite honestly, I'm not sure what purpose that would serve, even if I could pronounce it.


Belated, on Woden's Daeg
[info]eureka2814

Upon looking at my calendar this morning, I was struck by the sudden and horrible realization that I haven't posted in over a week. I wondered furiously what to post, and came up with absolutely nothing.

Which is fantastic, because now I'm sitting in the school library with some weird kid looking over my shoulder (yes, you, stop reading my stuff), and I only have ten minutes to write this.

Then, I looked back at my calendar and found inspiration.

Today's Lingustic October topic: The names of the days of the week. Following is the chronicle of my epic investigation into the names of these days, which takes me to Norway, Dark-Ages England, Wales, Spain, Rome, and Iceland. Well, not literally of course, and if that's what you were hoping for then prepare to be terribly disappointed.

I found out this morning that "Wednesday" acutally comes from "Odin's Day", just as "Thursday" is "Thor's Day" and Friday is "Freya's Day". Now this totally makes sense, except that I haven't the faintest idea why we'd name the days of our week after Norse gods. In English. Perhaps we decided that they were just so awesome that we couldn't resist naming our days after them. In the future, I'll be certain to use Norse battle cries on the appropriate days.

Wednesday Morning : BY ODIN'S EYEPATCH!
Thursday Morning: BY THOR'S HAMMER!
Friday Morning: BY FREYA'S RADIANT BEAUTY!

I may have to discontinue this habit after entering college; I'm not sure how well my roommate will react when I wake up every morning screaming praise to the Norse gods.

(later on, I figured out that the reason for our days being named after these particular deities is because the English language and culture is a casserole combination of several different other languages and cultures, including Norse. It's included in the foundation of some Germanic languages, of which English is one. Which would totally explain our screwed-up, unique, fantastic spelling and grammar rules. After all, a normal language can't possibly come out of a culture that uses that many r's.

Norse is also included in the foundation of the Icelandic language, which (by the way) is renowned as being one of the most difficult languages in the world, most likely due to their gross overuse of consonants and weird, indecipherable symbols. "I can't speak Icelandic" is so hard to say in Icelandic that if you got stranded among throngs of Icelanders, you'd be totally screwed. Case in point: Try saying "Ég get ekki talað íslensku" (I can't speak Icelandic) five times fast, followed by "þar er baðherbergi" (where's the bathroom) and "Ég er að deyja úr hræðilegt stunga sár" (I'm dying of horrible stab wounds), and it should give you a good reason not to go to Iceland. )

Look at me, I can hammer nails. With a mallet.

Upon further investigation, I fount that it's from Anglo-Saxon. "Saturday", for example, comes from "Saturn's day" (named for a Roman titan) or, in Anglo-Saxon, sater daeg. Which probably makes the other roots things like thor's daeg and woden's daeg and all manner of bizzarroid Anglo-saxon phrases.
 
Of all the langauges that contributed to the creation of our language, Anglo-Saxon - that is, Old English - was probably one of the weirdest.For example, Old English for "your mom" (which was a common insult then as now) was þine modor. When you pronounce this correctly, (thee-nuh mow-door), it actually sort of sounds like "thine mother". Of course, this conjures of images of dark-ages Anglo teenagers spitting funny-sounding  insults at each other. (This gets even funnier if you imagine them speaking Welsh. "Your mom" in modern Welsh is "eich mam", which when said, makes you sound as if you're hacking up a hairball. "That's what she said" in modern Welsh is "dyna beth ddywedodd", which has so many consonants that I'm not even going to try and pronounce it, for risk of my tongue falling out of my skull.)

Getting back to the days of the week: the entities for which they are named seemed completely random. "Monday" - moon's day, because even though the moon has control over the entire ocean, it needs its own day, too. "Tuesday" - Tyr's day, which gets into Norse Deities, as does Wednesday (Woden's Day) Thursday (Thor's Day) and Friday (Freya's Day). But then there's the totally random "Saturday" (Saturn's Day), which skips several thousand miles to the south and suddenly decides it wants to be Roman, and then "Sunday" (Sun's day, but not "Sudanday", as I nearly just typed, which would be a completely different day, and an unlikely name for a day of the week seeing as Sudan wasn't a sovereign state until 1953), literally "day of the Sun".  

When you consider the names of the days of the week in Romance languages - Spanish, for example -lunes, martes, miercoles, jueves, viernes, sabado, domingo - it gets random-er. The day of the moon sticks around for lunes, but martes is named for Mars, miercoles for Mercury, jueves for Jupiter, viernes for Venus, and sabado for... well, Saturn.

I looked at this at first and thought, "Well of course they're totally named for different deities, they come from different cultures." But then I investigated further, and fell out of my chair.

Are you ready? This is gonna blow your mind.

They are based off the same types of deity.

Sabado, from Rome's titan Saturn, just like our is from Old English sater daeg.
Lunes, from latin "Luna", same as Monday or "Moon's day".
Martes, based off the Roman God Mars, the god of war, corresponding with Tyr, for "Tyr's Day", the Norse God of War.
Jueves, from Rome's Jupiter (Jove), who was the god of thunder. Thursday is associated with Thor, the Norse god of... drum roll please...thunder.
Viernes, from Rome's Venus, the goddess of love and beauty. Friday, from Freya's day. Guess what Freya was associated with?


Domingo to Sunday and Miercoles to Wednesday were the only slightly weird ones. Miercoles, from Mercury, the Roman Messenger God; "Woden's Day" based off of Woden (Odin), who isn't really associated with either messenger-ing or trade, which are both within Mercury's domain.

Perhaps this isn't as exciting as I think it is. However, my cries of glee when I discovered this made the neighbors call the cops, so you'd better be as pleased with this as I am. Otherwise, you're paying my bail.

I don't know why they're named for these particular types of deities, however - maybe people living in the middle ages had particularly terrible thunderstorms on Thursdays, and Friday is indeed beautiful. Without further research, however, this isn't something I can clear up for you. At least, not without a time machine. Speaking of which, if anyone wants to purchase one for me...


Anyway, I suppose I should wrap up this post with a brief revisit to the Welsh language.

Monday- Dydd Llun

Tuesday -Dydd Mawrth

Wednesday- Dydd Mercher

Thursday- Dydd Iau

Friday- Dydd Gwener

Saturday- Dydd Sadwrn

Sunday- Dydd Sul


How do you even pronounce "dydd"? "Dead"? "Deed"? "Dwidd"? "Dodd"? "Dwood"? "Dwod"?

I think I'll stop trying now.

Edit: The days of the week in Icelandic, by the way, from Monday through Sunday, are Mánudagur, Þriðjudagur, Miðvikudagur, Fimmtudagur, Föstudagur, Laugardagur, and Sunnudagur. If you cared, or needed to know what day of the week it was  in Iceland.


 

"...now I'm gonna die in a dungeon... in Cardiff!"

Vulpine Etymology
[info]eureka2814

Recently, the word "decapitate" was called to my attention. This word, just in case you didn't know, means "to behead" or "to remove one's head". But not "one's own head", because although this may be possible, it would also be exceedingly difficult. ( I later realized that this would be called autodecapitation.)


Now, the root of the word itself is a bit strange. The prefix de generally indicates reversal or removal (the latter in the case of decapitate). The root of the word, capit, (I believe) means "head". So the meaning of the word makes sense, but the fact that a term was invented for such a gruesome act is bizarre. Who sat down one day and decided, "Hey, we're gonna come up with a word for lopping people's heads off, because behead and decollate aren't quite good enough."

Upon looking into this matter further, one realizes that the English language has a whole slew of words for violent things. Defenestration, for example, is the act of throwing someone out a window. (The first thing that pops up when I type defenestration into Google is "notable defenestrations in history". This is a job I would like to have; that is, looking up the notable defenestrations that have occured since the foundation of the human race. Like the "Defenestration of Prague", for example. Yes, it's an actual historical event.) Throwing oneself out a window is autodefenestration, literally "defenestrating oneself".  The literal meaning of the word? De implies removal, and the word fenestrated means "having windows". So, literally, defenestration means "the act of removing windows". What the meaning of the word does not imply is the fact that it is "the act of removing windows, by throwing a person through them".

The "Defenestration of Prague". This event occured when everyone wore pleated pants and silly hats as a fashion statement, presumably to protest being shoved out of windows.

Another one - impale - "to fix upon, or pierce through with, anything pointed" - usually, this involves putting a person on a giant spike, if you happen to be a medieval monarch. Root im (meaning not) and pale meaning (basically, although this isn't an exact definition) "pointed stick". This didn't make any sense, until I realized that im and em can be basically the same prefix, meaning "to put into". Assuming that impale does not mean "not a sharp pointy stick",  I can assume it means "to put into a sharp pointy stick".  I'm not sure I want to envision how you would literally impale someone, especially using something like a toothpick. Wince.


We also have huge lists of other bizarre words with no apparent reason to them: impignorate, meaning to pawn or mortgage something, or floccinaucinihilipilification, meaning to estimate things as worthless. The only thing I can find on either of these words is that they come from Latin. (Apparently, the latter is a combination of four Latin words-  flocci, nauci, nihili, pilifi - which I actually suspect to be a quartet of evil rhyming garden gnomes.) The fear of long words is, as I'm sure you've heard, hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia, which I'm not even going to try to pronounce. The mulligrubs is a slang term for a depressed state of mood, despite its sounding like a word for a maggot with a mullet; nudiustertian is not a term for clotheless mermaid, but a word meaning "the day before yesterday". (Mermaid itself is a strange word, when one thinks about it.)
 



Oh words, how I love thee.


 

 



Crayons (Vlog)
[info]eureka2814

Just in case you wanted to listen to me ramble for five minutes about crayons and twinkies, you can click on this link.

(I desperately need an editing tool and a better webcam. Ideas?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcO0n7FoPjA







Poll #1626094 Twinkies
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 2

Weirdest crayon name you've encountered?

Favourite crayon flavour?

Why are you eating crayons?

Should Fearless Fox keep doing vlogs or keep to text?



Terse Tuesday: Toads and Rotten Vegetables
[info]eureka2814

I'm very crunched for time, so I must apologise for the sorry state of this post. Laugh if you can, but if you also find it prudent to throw rotten vegetables or tie my shoelaces together, I will accept said punishment with naught but a bowed head.

(Upon later reflection, I realise that this may mean that I have an abusive relationship with my readers.
Perhaps it's time for us to see a counselor?
Though not is good too. Perhaps not is a better idea.
Please don't throw another tomato.)




I would give you the life-story that I generally give before bashing on historical figures, but I'm not really sure how to preface this. So I guess I'll dive right in.



 

Long story short: I believe Daniel Webster was part toad. 

 


Were people just less attractive in the 19th century, or something?
 



Zombiedore
[info]eureka2814

Many of my friends aren't exactly known for their copious amounts of sanity. This fact was once again proven to me today when two of my friends opened their locker and revealed various pictures of "hot men" plastered on the inside of the door. Some of these were siblings of friends, some were actors, and in the centre was a whiteboard with "HOT MEN!!!" written on it in big letters.

"We finally got another picture of Gene Wilder up," one said with a tone of pride in her voice. "He fell out last year."

With a brief moment of terror, I quickly surveyed the locker for the Gene Wilder picture. Thankfully, it was not this one:




"You've still got some blank spots," I said, warily, eyeing the patches of original colour that could be seen through the pictures.

"Yeah. Next to go up'll Albus Dumbledore. But the first actor, not the second one. I think we should just raise the first one from the dead, just so he can act Dumbledore. Just for the next movie. Then he can die again."

This confused me in two ways. 1) I wasn't certain how Richard Harris fell into the category of "hot men" (more like "geriatric men" or perhaps even "dead men", and 2) I think zombies might have a hard time acting. Can you imagine?  Trying to write a script for an undead actor would be something of a challenge, and all your cast and crew members would have to be armed with shotguns at all times. And although this may be acceptable in an action movie, the characters of Harry Potter are not exactly known for their liberal exercise of their second amendment rights (that is, were they Americans).






Can you imagine how much of a struggle getting him to say the lines would be?

Zombiedore: "Braaaaaaaaaaainz."
Director: "No, no, the line is, 'I'm not worried, Harry, I'm with you.' "
Zombiedore: *beat* "BRAINZ?"
Director: "Okay, we'll say it slowly. Repeat: I'm not worried..."
Zombiedore: "BRAAAAAAAAAAINZ!"
Director: "NO, ZOMBIEDORE! THERE ARE NO BRAINS ON THIS SET!"
Zombiedore: "...Grraaaaaaaaargh."


I suppose a zombie actor could work for a Harry Potter movie. He could say "traaaaaaaainz" in reference to the Hogwarts Express. "Deraaaaaaaaaaaanged" in reference to Voldemort. He could address Hermione: "Graaaaaaaaaaanger". However, the disadvantages of having the brains of cast and crew brutally devoured might outweigh the benefits of having someone who could stand and stare blankly for long periods of time.


Were I Voldemort, I'd certainly be more afraid of a Dumbledore that has a craving for my cerebral tissue than the pacifist senior citizen that we originally had. I'd be even more afraid now, now that (spoiler, but if you haven't gotten this far yet you're not worthy of living) Dumbledore can become a zombie. Like really. Who's this moron we've got leading Hogwarts now? Let's just resurrect Dumbledore and he'll do a better job of destroying the school than ol' Voldy ever did. (if this occurs, the only request I have is that Filch get eaten first).

So, McGonagall, get out of Zombiedore's office. He wants his post back, catwoman.




Part 2, AKA Vlog portion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2Ji-TI-lSc

Terse Tuesday: Airports
[info]eureka2814
Today we're in vlog form.


Terse Tuesday: Airports
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9cUfBtPxAI

The Hoover Block
[info]eureka2814


I've obligated myself to two entries per week, and since my week begins on Tuesday (for those of you saying "Since when?!" the answer is "Since now"), I still have four hours left to post!

But the problem is this: I have nothing to post about.

I could talk about the living history event I attended on Saturday, during which I nearly got heatstroke and ingested a few grams of gunpowder, all while crossdressing and carrying a big gun. I could discuss in detail my driver's test on Friday, which I took using a car that was proably older than the eighty-year-old administering the test, or the hour-long wait at the DMV and all the interesting people ahead of me in line, half of whom apparently didn't know their own full names. I could talk about how I pwned a bunch of freshmen at wiffleball today, or how campaign commercials in this state don't really tell me anything about the candidates besides the fact that they hate splatter commercials and that they shower with their clothes on. I could discuss the number of freckles on my left arm. I could share my plan to steal my brilliant friend's brain whilst he sleeps in order to get a better score on the SATs, but I don't actually know if he reads this or not and I'd rather not be met with a sharp weapon when I sneak into his dorm with surgical tools.  I could chatter on about counting lines in the centre of the road, or running around in circles making airplane noises.

The truth of the matter is, dear readers, that writer's block is a really horrible thing that affects all who dabble in wordcrafting. There's some malevolent god of writer's block who sits upon a giant paper brick and points his stick of uninspiration at people. It's his only job. It's the only thing he know how to do. He loves it, and he is SO VERY EVIL.

Also, he's nailed to the brick, so there's not much else he can do. 

 Wikipedia even defines it as a "condition". Usually, I reserve the term "condition" for really serious things like illness and mental disorders, but I suppose writer's block qualififes as both. It's a debilitating condition that has ruined many of my hats - fedoras don't take kindly to being thrown at peevish felines, even when their owner is incredibly frustrated.

A teacher once gave me a tip on how to deal with writer's block.
"Roll your head back and forth on the desk," he said, sagely, "And shriek, 'Narrrheeearrrreaaarrrreaarrrarrhearrrrr.' It works like a charm."

This didn't actually do anything for the writer's block. However, it did reduce a classroom of thirty or so teenagers to rolling their heads around on their desks and wailing incomprehensibly.

At this point, however, I am not above such advice, which just may explain why my dog is currently hiding under my bed with a look of utter terror in his eyes.

I was told, once, to envision writer's block as a literal block of wood or similar material, something that could be pushed or shoved or worked past. So now I'm sitting in front of a giant bloody dam, and, lacking dynamite, I decide instead to roll my head back and forth on my desk and make guttural noises. Because I have no other ideas.


If only I could find that dam inspiration...


 



Terse Tuesday: The Pirate Picture
[info]eureka2814
After a month-long trip to a foreign country, people tend to ask you to show them pictures. This WOULD be fine, if it weren't for a certain picture that ruins the entire  album:

 

Okay, in my defence, she told me to imitate a pirate. So that's what I did. You can't fault me for not understanding that she meant "Imitate a pirate, while appearing civil and sane."


 
Note the halfhearted attempt to protect the identities of the other two in the picture. I've got a "thing" about disclosing identities without permission. I'm afraid I'll get sued, and that would be no fun, even if it would make for a fantastic post once I got over the lawsuit.


Fantastic. The most lasting memory I will have of Costa Rica is myself in a pirate hat looking like a frothing lunatic.




Hold on.

I am a frothing lunatic.


Arr.







Auditions
[info]eureka2814

Auditions, I must say, are the singular most horrible thing invented by mankind, sans exception. This includes nuclear weapons and chinese water torture, which should give you an idea of how bad auditions actually are.

Most people don't like to be judged or grouped. Nobody likes to be looked at and be told, "THOU ART NOT WORTHY". In an audition, however, you prepare feverishly for weeks in advance and then, voluntarily, go for the sole purpose of being judged. It's like being a gladiator in ancient Rome, except the emperor who decides your fate happens to be 1) a new-agey looking mid-twenties theatre person with several piercings or 2) an aged musician with hawkish eyes and crazy, thick white hair that appears to move on its own (if there's anything I've noticed about orchestral maestros, it's that they all have really really lunatic hairstyles regardless of any other factors).  

 

During my last audition, I did not see the people who were to decide my fate. Instead, my playing was taped, to be sent off to them.

This is in some ways much worse. Rather than seeing the stern musicians who were to judge my worthiness, I was left to imagine them.

Somewhere in Greeley, Colorado, there is a sinister board string musicians sitting in a semicircle around a stack of tapes. The room is lit only by torches set upon the cold, stone wall. They number seven, for the seven deadly sins, and their eyes glow yellow in the half darkness.
"PLAY THE FIRST TAPE!" bellows the one in the centre, and holds a fist up in the air.
"OH NO IT IS A VIOLINIST." cries another, obviously horrified. "BURN THE TAPE!"
"BURN THE TAPE!" echo each of the others, and the tape is disintegrated by a magic missile before the first scale is even played through the second octave.
"PLAY THE NEXT TAPE!" bellows the first, again, and holds up his fist again.
"NEXT TAPE!" echo the others. A bassist begins to play.
"I LIKE THIS PERSON'S TONALITY," says one.
"YES," agrees another, "HE IS HITTTING THE NOTES QUITE WELL."
"THE TEMPO IS QUITE STEADY." observes a third. "HE'S NOT RUSHING."
And then the bassist misses the seventh degree on the third octave of his minor scale, and fourteen eyes flash red as the torches flare up. A volcano erupts somewhere in the distance, burying an Italian city. Lightning arcs from the sky and strikes the centre of the town. A hurricane slams the coast of Florida. The bad note has wrought destruction amongst the people of earth.
"BURN IT! BURN IT!" they crow in unison, and this tape is disintegrated as well. They all chuckle wholeheartedly and the earth shakes.
"NEXT TAPE!" the first roars again, and puts his fist up in the air.

This would all be fine and good, except for two things.
1) I paid twenty-five dollars for this damn audition.
2) I spent an hour of my life every day for the past three months preparing for this damn thing.
3)  After destroying the tapes, the sinister council tracks down the failed musicians and burns their house down as punishment for sucking.

Auditions in person are worse. Because then, there's no tape to disintegrate.

 



Terse Tuesday: Hypothetical Situations
[info]eureka2814


"I really don't want to go to gym class," I groaned to my left-handed artist friend today. "Gym is agony."

"I could take your place," she suggested. "We could switch third period classes. I could substitute for you in gym class and you could to to my art class."

"What are you doing in art class?" I asked, wary.

"Painting my sister," she replied.

Here's one thing you have to understand about me: I can't draw. Well, I can, but my abilities are limited to dinosaurs and a few lumpy variants of pac-man. If I had switched classes with my friend, not only would her grade have dropped by a few letters, but her portfolio would have been filled with gloppy paintings of neon yellow Pac-man figures devouring small cartoon dinosaurs. 
 
Perhaps I'd add a speech bubble for effect. Waka-waka-waka.

I'm sure this would have been fine for a second-grade art class, but this left-handed friend of mind just happened to be in AP Art. Maybe I could pass it off as surrealism, but that doesn't mean I could explain to her art teacher why her sister had suddenly been polymorphed into a lumpy, carnivorous arcade character.
Perhaps I could pass it off as a side effect of being a second violinist.

I briefly considered it, and after a long silence, I finally said,
"Maybe switching classes isn't such a great idea."

"No," she concurred, thoughtfully, "Maybe not."
 



You are viewing [info]eureka2814's journal